diff --git a/pres.tex b/pres.tex
index b721f4c..d952c04 100644
--- a/pres.tex
+++ b/pres.tex
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@
     \frametitle{Explaining models}
     Idea: We give a global understanding of the model by explaining a set of individual instances
     \begin{itemize}
-    \item Still model agnositc (since the individual explanations are)
+    \item Still model agnostic (since the individual explanations are)
     \item Instances need to be selected in a clever way, as people won't have time to look through all explanations
     \item Some definitions
       \begin{itemize}
@@ -635,7 +635,6 @@
     \begin{itemize}
     \item Is it fair that the authors create their data in such a way that \emph{Parzen} becomes unusable in their tests?
     \item What do you expect to happen if the data is very non-linear even in the local predicitions?
-    \item The \emph{K-Lasso} algorithm used in \emph{Algorithm 1} is explicitly used for regression analysis and as such it should only work when they use linear models for their explanations. Is this okay?
     \end{itemize}
   \end{frame}
 \end{document}